COLORMUNKI DISPLAY VS SPYDER 5 PRO
COLORMUNKI DISPLAY VS SPYDER 5 ISO

Many people often forget that different monitors can have different settings, thus producing different hues of what is actually the same color. It appears the bundle of the i1DisplayPro with ColorChecker Passport never goes below $249.so Amazon's current price of $267 doesn't look that bad.Having accurate colors on your display screen is highly imperative in order to truly optimize your photographs. It sounds to me like a lot of people just use the spectrophotometer to calibrate a colorimeter and then use a colorimeter for day to day calibration purposes. I don't even own a printer, so would likely be using a lab for prints so for me there is not the additional advantage of being able to calibrate a printer using a spectrophotometer, it is merely a question of accuracy/ease of use. So yea, I do have quite the spectrum of devices I could use this on, but a true spectrophotometer is probably out of my budget as an initial entry point. In the future, assuming the refurbs go 30% off again or if there is quite the deal on a new one I plan to pick up a Dell U3014 (GB-r LED backlight I believe) or similar. And while I'm at it why not calibrate the CRT in my MAME cabinet.calibrate alllllllll the things I suppose.Īfter that I'd profile a Mitsubishi DLP in my theater room (2nd highest priority after my main computer LCD). The CRT isn't a priority as it's a secondary display, but as long as I already have the device hey, why not. I'd likely be profiling standard CCFL backlit LCD's for now and an ancient CRT as far as computer displays. I would say that at the very least that if you DIY profile against an i1 pro, you'll be limited to fairly minor errors, whereas there may be the possibility of a larger error by trusting factory calibration tables, if your particular display is different enough.

The only way to answer this question is for more people (who have access to higher end spectros and a wide variety of displays) to actually run experiments. The offsets may be more accurate, but the reference (in this case, the i1 pro) won't be.

COLORMUNKI DISPLAY VS SPYDER 5 PRO

The advantage of profiling with something like an i1 pro on one's own display is that the offsets are tailored to that particular display.īut in cases where disparity between displays is not that significant, the increased accuracy of the reference grade calibration may result in superior performance for the colorimeter out of the box compared to profiling it oneself against a budget spectro. The factory calibrated colorimeter has the advantage of being profiled againts a lab grade reference spectro, which is clearly superior to an i1 pro. Yea, it seems that this is a bit of an open question. Short: You can buy and use this probe without to be worried about accuracy problems out of the box. That doesn't make the i1 Pro a totally bad choice for display measurements – but limits its accuracy.įurthermore general limitations of current colorimetry (in particular observer metamerism) have bigger impacts than absolute errors in the range of a i1 Display Pro compared to a an ideal reference and current display technologies. In addition to this some other limitations exist.

COLORMUNKI DISPLAY VS SPYDER 5 ISO

Its optical bandpass does not match the recommendations for luminous color measurements (see ISO 12646, ISO 3664). When comparing the data with reference measurements you should keep in mind that the often used i1 Pro is a consumer instrument mainly designed for surface color measurements. X-Rite ships the i1 Display Pro with different generic characterization sets which will lead to absolute sufficient measurement results regarding all kind of computer LCDs (CCFL, WCG-CCFL, W-LED, GB-r-LED, RGB-LED). That approach even allows for evaluating the colorimetric data of a color stimulus under different observer functions (otherwise limited to spectral measurements). Click to expand.The i1 Display Pro has an advantageous filter design (quite close to the color-matching functions of the 2 degree CIE standard observer) and implements a processing system based on spectral characterizations instead of a simple 3x3 matrix directly applied to the tristimulus values.

Colormunki display vs spyder 5